winneganfake: (Default)
[personal profile] winneganfake
Ok, this sums up my reaction fairly well, given that I finished the book half an hour ago, and I'm still having trouble parsing complete sentences:



The difference would be the fact that I'm currently still muttering a lot less complimentary language about said author.

Re: hoo boy, this opens up a can of worms....

Date: 2010-05-06 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] esmeraldus-neo.livejournal.com
I read them, I criticize them. Fan is a loaded word. Critic is a better word. Would that word be better, if I said I liked to write about them from a psychoanalytic perspective? Because there are some knotty problems there.

And I came here originally to ask a balancing opinion for a critical opinion of the Dresden novels, in order to be fair. I didn't come here and say, "Oh, boy, never gonna read THOSE suckers."

I said I had heard they might be problematic and what did Dmitri think of those problems.

And I did think that maybe the Dresden books and their problems would take up too much time if they weren't worth the effort, but I was troubling to get a second opinion.

Re: hoo boy, this opens up a can of worms....

Date: 2010-05-06 01:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faerieburst.livejournal.com
"Fan is a loaded word."

Fan is the word you chose. You should probably think about why that was the first word that came to mind. Why that, when you were thinking about how to describe yourself in relation to a female serial rapist, you immediately went with "fan".

Also, "fan" is NOT EVEN REMOTELY the same thing as "critic." They are not, in fact, synonyms.

For example, compare these two statements:

I am a fan of Emily Dickinson.

I am a critic of Fred Phelps.

Please note, the top one is something I approve of, am in favour of. The second is one I disapprove of, am not in favour of.

You said exactly zero about "being a critic" (or critical for that matter), or "writing about them from a psychoanalytic perspective" or anything else. You said, flatly, and simply, you were "an Anita Blake fan." You are retconning like a mofo at the moment. You either need to start actually saying what you mean, or just stop altogether, because this "No, no, even though those are the words I said, that's not what I MEANT. I meant this COMPLETELY DIFFERENT thing with totally different, unrelated words." thing has gotten so very old.


"And I came here originally to ask a balancing opinion for a critical opinion of the Dresden novels, in order to be fair. I didn't come here and say, "Oh, boy, never gonna read THOSE suckers.""

Lady, you REALLY gotta start going back and reading what you wrote. Actually, you DID come in here, right off the bat, and say you weren't planning on reading them.

Here is the VERY first comment you made: "I was reading about the Dresden Files series the other day, and I just feel it's not for me. So I expect to be spared this pain."

That was it, the TOTALITY of your comment. Please point out in that comment where you "came here originally to ask a balancing opinion". Please point out where you say anything about looking for any opinion at all. It's not there. What IS there is a flat statement that you feel they aren't for you and you "expect to be spared this pain", a fairly clear statement of your lack of intent to read them.

You may well have segued into something else later, but you did NOT "come here originally to ask a balancing opinion." You came here originally to state you didn't plan on reading them 'cause they weren't for you.


"And I did think that maybe the Dresden books and their problems would take up too much time if they weren't worth the effort,"

But, by your "I'm an Anita Blake fan" statement, you determined that a female serial rapist WAS worth the time? Her child rape was worth the effort? Her inability to stop herself from taking away men's ability to say no and taking them sexually against their will wasn't too much of a problem for you?

I can help you out here: Harry doesn't rape anyone. No one at all. Not a teenager, not an adult, no one. So, as the threshold for you seems to be "I can handle books that involve serial rape", then you should breeeeeeeze through the Dresden books. He's a freakin' saint comparatively.

~Aramada

Profile

winneganfake: (Default)
winneganfake

October 2012

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags